A. No person shall construct or operate a telecommunication tower, except those approved prior to the effective date of this article, until he has obtained a special use permit as provided in Article X and this article.
B. Applicants proposing to collocate on a previously approved telecommunication tower do not require a special use permit, but are required to obtain a building permit. The Code Enforcement officer (CEO) may require the applicant to submit any of the items under § 160-84A below as part of the building permit process.

Use of existing tall structures.
Use of existing tall structures may require a special use permit. At all times, shared use of existing tall structures (for example, municipal water towers, multistory buildings, church steeples, farm silos, etc.) and existing or approved towers (see § 160-83B above) shall be preferred to the construction of new towers.

A. An applicant proposing to share use of an existing tall structure shall be required to submit:

(1) A completed application for a building permit.
(2) Documentation of intent from the owner of the existing facility to allow shared use.
(3) A site plan. The site plan shall show all existing and proposed structures and improvements including antennas, roads, buildings, guy wires and anchors, parking, fencing and landscaping, and shall include grading plans for new facilities and roads. Any methods used to conceal the modification of the existing facility shall be indicated on the site plan.
(4) An engineer's report certifying that the proposed shared use will not diminish the structural integrity and safety of the existing tall structure, and explaining what modifications, if any, will be required in order to certify to the above.
(5) A completed short environmental assessment form (EAF) and a completed visual EAF addendum.

B. If an applicant proposing to share use of an existing tall structure submits complete and satisfactory documentation in accordance with Subsection A above, and if modifications indicated according to Subsection A are deemed insignificant by the Board, and after the Zoning Board conducts a public hearing and complies with all State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) provisions, the Zoning Board shall grant a special use permit without further review under this section. if the Board determines that any modifications indicated according to Subsection A are significant, it may require further review according to §§ 160-89 through 160-99.

New towers considered; report required.

A. The Board may consider a new telecommunication tower when the applicant demonstrates that shared use of existing tall structures and existing or approved towers is impractical.
B. An applicant shall be required to present an adequate report inventorying all existing tall structures and existing or approved towers within a reasonable distance of the proposed site. This distance shall be determined by the Board in consultation with the applicant. The report shall outline opportunities for shared use of these existing facilities as an alternative to a proposed new tower. The report shall demonstrate good faith efforts to secure shared use from the owner of each existing tall structure and existing or approved tower as well as documentation of the physical, technical and/or financial reasons why shared usage is not practical in each case. Written requests and responses for shared use shall be provided.

New towers on existing tower sites.
Shared usage of existing tower site for placement of new tower. Where shared use of existing tall structures and existing or approved towers is found to be impractical, the applicant shall investigate shared usage of an existing tower site for its ability to accommodate a new tower and accessory uses. Documentation and conditions shall be in accordance with § 160-85 above. Any proposals for a new telecommunication tower on an existing tower site shall also be subject to the requirements of §§ 160-88 through 160-99.

New towers at new locations.
The Board may consider a telecommunication tower on a site not previously developed with an existing tower when the applicant demonstrates that shared use of existing tall structures, and existing or approved towers, is impractical, and submits a report as described in § 160-85 above; and when the Board determines that shared use of an existing tower site for a new tower is undesirable based upon the applicant's investigation in accordance with § 160-86. Any proposal for a new telecommunication tower shall also be subject to the requirements of §§ 160-88 through 160-99.

Future shared use of new towers.
The applicant shall design a proposed new telecommunications tower to provide for collocation of at least three carriers or designed so that it can be retrofitted to accommodate a minimum of three carriers. The applicant shall submit to the Board a letter of intent committing the owner of the proposed new tower, and his/her successors in interest, to negotiate in good faith for shared use of the proposed tower by other telecommunications providers in the future. This letter shall be filed with the CEO prior to issuance of a building permit and shall state that the applicant will:

A. Respond within 90 days to a request for information from a potential shared-use applicant.
B. Negotiate in good faith concerning future requests for shared use of the new tower by other telecommunications providers.
C. Allow shared use of the new tower if another telecommunications provider agrees in writing to pay reasonable charges. The charge may include but is not limited to a prorated share of the cost of site selection, planning, project administration, land costs, site design, construction and maintenance financing, return on equity, and depreciation and all of the costs adapting the tower or equipment to accommodate a shared user without causing electromagnetic interference.

Plan requirements.

A. An applicant shall be required to submit a site plan in accordance with § 160-65. The site plan shall show all existing and proposed structures and improvements including roads, buildings, tower(s), guy wires and anchors, antennas, parking and landscaping and fencing, and shall include grading plans for new facilities and roads.
B. Supporting documentation. The applicant shall submit a complete short EAF, a complete visual environmental assessment form (visual EAF addendum) and documentation on the proposed intent and capacity of use as well as a justification for any clearing required. The applicant shall also submit a copy of its Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license.

Visual impact assessment.
The Board may require the applicant to undertake a visual impact assessment which may include:

A. A Zone of Visibility Map shall be provided in order to determine locations where the tower may be seen.
B. Pictorial representations of "before and after" views from key viewpoints both inside and outside of the Town including but not limited to state highways and other major roads, state and local parks, other public lands, preserves or any historic sites normally open to the public, and from any other location where the site is visible to a large number of visitors or travellers. The board shall determine the appropriate key sites at a presubmission conference with the applicant.
C. Assessment of alternative tower designs and color schemes, as described in § 160-92 below.
D. Assessment of the visual impact of the tower base, guy wires, fencing around the tower, accessory buildings and overhead utility lines from abutting properties and streets.

Letter of credit or other security.
The applicant and the owner of record of the premises shall be required to execute and file with the Town Clerk of the Town of Jerusalem a letter of credit or other form of security acceptable to the Town Attorney as to form and manner of execution in an amount sufficient for the faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this section, the conditions of the permit or approval issued hereunder, for the observation of all Town local laws or ordinances to cover the maintenance of the tower during its lifetime, and provide for its removal. The amount required shall be at the applicant's expense as determined by the Town Engineer. In the event of default upon the performance of any of such conditions, the letter of credit or security shall be forfeited to the Town of Jerusalem, which shall be entitled to maintain an action thereon. The letter of credit or security shall remain in full force and effect until the removal of the tower, satellite dish, antenna, pole and/or accessory facility/structure, and site restoration.

Intermunicipal notification for new towers.
In order to keep neighboring municipalities informed, and to facilitate the possibility of directing that an existing tall structure or existing telecommunication tower in a neighboring municipality be considered for shared use, and to assist in the continued development of county 911 services, the Board shall require that:

A. An applicant who proposes a new telecommunication tower shall notify in writing the legislative body of each municipality that borders Jerusalem, the Yates County Planning Board and the Director of Yates County Emergency Services. Notification shall include the exact location of the proposed tower and a general description of the project including but not limited to the height of the tower and its capacity for future shared use.
B. Documentation of this notification shall be submitted to the Board at the time of application.

See Article XVIII: Telecommunication Towers for more information.
See Forms and Applications for more information on permits.